Browsing by Subject ""Blower" and "kankles player" cultures"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Publication Kalbos archajinio paveldo iškrovos lietuvių poezijoje[Archaic language heritage charges in Lithuanian poetry]research articlePsichoanalizės fenomeno interpretacijos = Interpretations of the phenomenon of psychoanalysis : [mokslinių straipsnių rinkinys] / Lietuvos kultūros tyrimų institutas ; sudarytojai Antanas Andrijauskas, Vytautas Rubavičius. Vilnius : Meno rinkos agentūra, 2016, P. 429-439In the article, an assumption, based on the psychoanalysis (C. G. Jung) and linguistic (G. Yule, M. Ivic) theories, is made that poetry can reveal archaic language heritage (emotional, musical, lexical levels), and the goal is to look at Lithuanian poetry texts as creative unconscious archaeology vaults. Exploring the evolution of Lithuanian poetry in retrospect, it is discovered that archaic language heritage expressions of emotional and expressive origins (interjections) have been decreasing in poetry texts. Taking notice of the "blower" and "kankles player" cultural heritage of Lithuania ethnomusicology theory (R. Apanavicius), it is suggested to look for expressions of these melodies in Lithuanian poetry. This approach to the research reveals short, choppy lines (Eastern and North Lithuania) and continuous narrative tones (South and Western Lithuania) in poetry traditions, possibly related to archaeological Western and Eastern Baltic cultures. Using the parallels between Indo-European mythological (J. Puhvel) and North European languages linguistic (J. Lyons), possible Northern etymology roots of several archaic words (ašai, skliautas, grynas, vaiskus, blausus) that are used in Lithuanian poetry is tracked. The results of the researched aspectual sections of Lithuanian poetry confirm the archaeological conception that the Baltic tribes and Lithuanian nation and language forming as a local layered structure of several cultures (A. Girininkas), and ideas of post-process archaeology (I. Hodder) create new assumptions to continue the in-depth research of literature archaeology.33